I can now officially blame 24 hour news for nearly everything that is wrong in this world. It is a sad day when a potential Republican presidential candidate is on the ropes (or nearly so), and I can’t draw enjoyment from it.
Although I was not a fan of Governor Chris Christie from the start, I appreciated his gracious response to President Obama’s support of New Jersey after Hurricane Sandy in 2012. He took flak from the far right for saying something – anything – positive about the President. From my side of the aisle, he showed a lot more integrity than did Republican lawmakers who loudly bashed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, while at the same time (and with a lot less publicity) accepting stimulus money for their home states. He openly and without apology put the best interests of the citizens of New Jersey ahead of party, and future political ambitions. It’s what a governor gets paid to do.
I briefly wondered if I could vote for Christie someday, as a way of casting a vote against partisan politics. It wasn’t out of the question; there were times when I might have considered voting for John McCain. (That was long before 2008, in case you were wondering.) But when I evaluate Christie in total…Nah, it’ll never happen.
Chris Christie says he’s not a bully; he’s just a no-nonsense, what-you-see-is-what-you-get kind of guy. Ask a question he doesn’t feel like answering? He’ll tell you it’s none of your business. Question his effectiveness in a certain area? He’ll holler until he’s red in the face, and wag his finger at you.
I’ll let the people of New Jersey decide if that works for them, but it’s a liability in the national arena. He’s not the guy I want having diplomatic discussions with leaders of unfriendly nations – or with allies, for that matter.
(Have you noticed that every election cycle, a segment of America moons over a straight talker who becomes the early front-runner? He/she eventually crashes and burns, after becoming a little too “refreshing”. Remember Ross Perot? Herman Cain? Sarah Palin?)
Let’s fast forward to this week’s traffic scandal, which is quickly turning a bit Lord of the Flies on cable news. Yesterday, Christie spent two hours denying he had any knowledge of his staff’s ordering lane closures to snarl traffic to the George Washington Bridge in September, as political revenge against Fort Lee’s mayor.
While it is the role of the media to thoroughly investigate the matter, and assess whether actions by members of Christie’s administration reflect the petty, vindictive style of the boss, who may want to run for president in 2016 — it’s a CRAZY FEEDING FRENZY out there!
Some will argue that a liberal media agenda is at work – or maybe a tea party one. Others may think it’s the work of a few ambitious journalists, who want to turn the story into Watergate, and themselves into Woodward or Bernstein (depending on hair color). It may even be driven by how easily the scandal lends itself to pithy headlines: Christie’s In a Jam!
I blame 24 hour news, and the incessant need for CONTENT. If you don’t think writers, editors and pundits are licking their collective chops because a story like this — if they can keep stoking suspicion of the Governor’s involvement — could fuel the news cycle for days… well, you probably don’t have a TV at your house. Or access to the internet.
In his new book “Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War,” former Secretary of State Robert Gates remembers that Washington lawmakers could be reasonable, right up to the point “the little red light went on atop a television camera [which] had the effect of a full moon on a werewolf.”
We’ve all seen it, and it’s enough to make you shake your head in despair. The fault lies not just with Congress, but also with the news networks that fan the flames, spin the facts, and broadcast on a loop. And it’s our fault, for giving our tacit approval of the coverage by watching it.
I received a breaking news alert from CNN this morning, letting me know that a batch of documents related to a New Jersey State Assembly investigation of the Governor’s advisors had JUST BEEN RELEASED. CNN assured me they would dig through the document “dump” and post updates online throughout the day.
2:58 p.m. ET – As you can expect, everyone is trying to get these documents at the same time, so download speed is slow. Bear with us.
Breathe easy, America. CNN is on the job.
2 thoughts on “Stand Down, CNN”
Ah, Bridgegate. Being the junkie that I am, of course I’m riveted by this story. I have no interest (zero) in hearing what cable TV has to say about it. (Well, besides Jon Stewart, whose take on it made me split my sides!) I do, however, find myself scouring every written word source that I can to learn more. Here are my completely-random thoughts on the subject:
*Chris Christie has always seemed like a borderline bully to me. He’s the miserable, fat kid (with serious self-esteem problems) who found himself in a position of power, and now he’s taking revenge on everyone who was mean to him in grade school!
*It’s a sad day in American that this man — irrespective of this scandal — is the #1 candidate the Republicans had/have as a 2016 presidential candidate. Enough said.
*The hubris shown by his office — whether he knew about it or not; ordered it or not — is stunning. That people in public office in any way shape or form feel like it’s okay to f* with people’s lives/livelihood like this is depressing beyond words. And even if he didn’t explicitly order it, obviously there’s something corrupt in his administration that his people thought this was acceptable behavior. When a fish stinks, it’s because that fish is rotting from the head.
Finally, I would say it’s unacceptable. Of course it’s unacceptable! But it happened so… what… are we just to accept it as another nail in the coffin of people who serve in public office. That the whole notion of serving your country as a “public servant” is just a mockery? ugh. I’m sad. For our country, for us, and for our kids especially.
Thanks for the great post, KK! xo
Thanks JC. I record The Daily Show so I saw the side-splitting stuff after I wrote this post. And I also watched Shields & Brooks on the PBS News Hour. I don’t always relate to Mark Shields, who is a little left-of-center even for me. But he made a great point, which you touch on also, that it’s hard to believe that Christie was the LAST guy of EVERYONE to get wind of this. Ronald Reagan could get away with that, but Chris Christie… not so much. Also, he did kind of over explain at his press conference…. “I was on the treadmill, running a 12 minute mile with a 2% incline then headed to the shower (my towel was Egyptian cotton) with my bottle of old spice that was about 2/3 full when a staffer pulled me aside….”
Again, I was never a fan. I have romantic ideas about the president. He should be smart and reserved and classy, and not lose his sh*t just because he’s asked a question he doesn’t like. Stuff that transcends party.
The thing that was bugging me the last two days though: it doesn’t feel like the media wants the truth for any reason that is not self serving. A combo of getting the scoop (not new) but simultaneously milking the cash cow story for as long as possible because cable news is 24 x 7.